Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Arbitration & Commercial LawDelhi High Court

M/S Tata Capital Ltd vs. Pawan Kumar

Arbitration Petition · CNR No. DLHC010282292026Decided 23 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
ARB.P. 1064/2026CNR: DLHC010282292026
Justice Om Prakash Shukla

Background

Tata Capital Ltd sought appointment of an arbitrator to resolve a dispute arising from a Loan Agreement dated 27.11.2024, alleging the borrower had defaulted on repayment obligations, with an outstanding claim of Rs. 18,27,575. Both parties agreed the dispute should go to arbitration under the loan agreement's arbitration clause.

Decision Breakdown

Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Court's role at this stage is limited to checking whether a valid arbitration agreement exists on the face of the contract, not deciding the merits of the dispute. Finding a clear, valid arbitration clause in the loan agreement (Clause 9), the Court appointed a named sole arbitrator (an Advocate-on-Record) to adjudicate the dispute under the rules of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, leaving all substantive pleas, including any jurisdictional objections, to be argued before the arbitrator.

Lesson Learnt

When a loan or commercial contract contains an arbitration clause, a court asked to appoint an arbitrator will not examine who is right or wrong in the underlying dispute: it will simply confirm the arbitration clause exists and hand the matter over to an arbitrator to decide everything else, including any defences.

M/S Tata Capital Ltd vs. Pawan Kumar – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware