Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
The Central Electricity Authority's 2010 Safety Regulations prescribe minimum qualifications (Regulations 6 and 7) for engineers, supervisors and technicians handling electrical safety functions, while Regulation 116 allows the government to permit "deviation" from these Regulations. Kerala's electricity board employees, transferred to a successor company (KSEBL) under a 2013 transfer scheme, included some who lacked these prescribed qualifications; the State Government issued an order in February 2019 exempting such employees from the qualification requirement so they could be promoted. This was challenged in the Kerala High Court, where a Single Judge struck down the exemption entirely as beyond the government's power, but a Division Bench partly restored it, upholding the exemption only for employees who had joined before the 2013 transfer scheme, not those who joined KSEBL afterward. Both the affected employees/KSEBL and other aggrieved parties appealed to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench's middle-ground ruling in full. It held that the word "deviation" in Regulation 116 is broad enough to include granting an "exemption" or relaxation from the qualification requirements, rejecting the argument (based on English contract-law precedents about the word "deviation") that deviation must mean something narrower than exemption, and that this power has historically existed even under the pre-2010 electricity safety rules. However, the Court agreed that this exemption power could only protect employees who were actually part of the electricity board on the date of the 2013 transfer scheme, because the statutory transfer protections under Section 133 of the Electricity Act are explicitly limited to employees transferred as of that date; extending the exemption to people hired by KSEBL afterward had no legal basis. The Court also noted safety considerations and the board's positive safety track record but held that did not justify open-ended exemption for later hires.
A government's power to grant a "deviation" from a technical safety regulation can validly include a qualification exemption, but such special protections tied to a service transfer scheme apply strictly to the employees covered on the date of that scheme. They cannot be stretched to cover people who joined the organisation only later.
