Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1073
In circumstantial-evidence cases, forensic and DNA evidence must actually corroborate the alleged crime: a conviction cannot survive where the most crucial scientific evidence, on its own terms, points away from rather than toward the prosecution's theory.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1074
A conviction based purely on circumstantial evidence requires every link in the chain, timeline, witness credibility, forensic matches, and motive, to be proven beyond reasonable doubt; gaps or suppressed evidence at any link entitle the accused to the benefit of the doubt, even in a serious case like a double murder.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8505
Courts will not quash a criminal case merely because the accused has a plausible alibi-type defence; unless that defence is conclusive and undisputed, the matter must be tested through the ordinary trial process.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8547
A private compromise between victim and accused cannot by itself secure quashing of a case involving serious, heinous allegations like attempted murder with a weapon: such matters must proceed to trial regardless of settlement.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8563
Railway Claims Tribunals cannot reject a bona fide passenger's death claim based on speculative inferences when there is no direct evidence of an alternative cause of death; the compensation scheme under the Railways Act is to be interpreted generously in favour of victims' families.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8559
In matrimonial offences, courts can and do quash criminal proceedings once a genuine compromise is verified directly with the complainant, sparing both parties a prolonged and pointless trial.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8541
A co-accused's bail does not automatically extend to another accused where their actual roles in the offence differ materially; delay caused by one's own defence counsel cannot later be used as a ground for bail.
Execution Petition · 2026:DHC:8567
An arbitral award must be adequately stamped before a court can enforce it; courts give only a limited window to cure such defects, after which the award becomes legally unusable until the deficiency is fixed.
Arbitration Petition · 2026:DHC:8555
A genuine settlement reached through mediation renders a pending arbitration-related court petition moot, allowing parties to close out litigation quickly once they resolve their dispute privately.
7878 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Under Kerala's 2017 law regulating private medical education, an Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee is empowered to scrutinize and finalize the fees private self-financing medical colleges can charge MBBS students, to prevent profiteering or capitation fees. After rounds of litigation, the Kerala High Court found that the Committee had not genuinely reconsidered the colleges' fee proposals afresh (as earlier directed) and had instead simply repeated its old fee figures, so it sent the matter back to the Committee again, but this time also restricted the Committee to relying only on the colleges' audited balance sheets (or provisional accounts, if audited ones were unavailable). Students and the State of Kerala appealed this High Court order to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court agreed with the High Court that the Committee had failed to properly reconsider the fee proposals on remand and must now do so genuinely, giving colleges a fair hearing and taking their proposed figures into account under Section 11 of the 2017 Act. However, it held that the High Court went too far by restricting the Committee to only audited balance sheets/provisional accounts: such a procedural straitjacket was not justified, since the Committee's power to scrutinize and regulate fee proposals under Section 11 should operate without artificial fetters on what material it may consider. The Court directed the Committee to complete the entire fee-fixation exercise for 2017-18 onward within three months, applying the settled principles from earlier precedents like P.A. Inamdar and Modern Dental College on non-exploitative, non-profiteering fee regulation.
Private professional institutions have autonomy to propose their own fees, but that autonomy is always subject to oversight by a statutory regulator ensuring the fee is reasonable and non-exploitative, while courts can direct such regulators to redo a flawed exercise, they should avoid imposing rigid procedural restrictions that go beyond the statute and hamper the regulator's own judgment.
