Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Acting on secret information, the Narcotics Control Bureau intercepted a parcel containing 50,000 mis-declared Tramadol tablets meant for delivery in Ludhiana. The person who booked the parcel disclosed that he had purchased the tablets from the respondent, Mohit Aggarwal, without any bill or prescription, and that the respondent in turn had sourced them from another accused. Acting on the respondent's own disclosures, NCB officials raided a godown and recovered a huge cache of psychotropic tablets, injections and syrup, and the respondent, in his statement, admitted to illegally trading in these drugs. He was arrested, his bail applications before the Special Judge (NDPS) were rejected twice, but the Delhi High Court subsequently granted him bail, reasoning that no incriminating material was recovered directly from his residence. The NCB appealed this to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court explained that Section 37 of the NDPS Act imposes strict additional conditions on bail for commercial-quantity drug offences: the court must be satisfied there are "reasonable grounds" (meaning credible and substantial grounds, not mere prima facie ones) for believing the accused is not guilty, and that he is unlikely to reoffend while on bail. While the Court agreed that the respondent's own confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act was inadmissible per the earlier ruling in Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu, it held that the High Court had wrongly ignored substantial independent circumstantial evidence, including that it was the respondent's own disclosures that led the NCB to the co-accused's godown and the massive drug haul, and mobile call records showing contact between the accused persons. The Supreme Court held that the "reasonable grounds" threshold under Section 37 had not been met, allowed the NCB's appeal, quashed the bail order, cancelled the respondent's bail bonds, and directed he be taken back into custody.
For serious commercial-quantity narcotics offences, courts must apply the strict twin conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act before granting bail, even if a confession is legally inadmissible, other circumstantial evidence (such as the accused's own disclosures leading to further recoveries) can still be enough to deny bail, and the mere absence of drugs found directly on the accused's person is not sufficient to presume innocence at the bail stage.
