Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Family LawSupreme Court of India

N.C.V. Aishwarya vs A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha

Civil AppealDecided 18 Jul 2022
Civil Appeal No. 4894 of 2022
S. Abdul Nazeer · J.K. Maheshwari

Background

A young married woman (21 years old) from Chennai sought to transfer her husband's marriage-annulment petition, which was pending before the Family Court at Vellore, to the Family Court at Chennai where she lived with her elderly parents. She argued she could not repeatedly travel to Vellore without support, and that she had also filed her own petitions, for restitution of conjugal rights and for maintenance, before the Chennai Family Court. The Madras High Court dismissed her transfer request, so she approached the Supreme Court.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that in matrimonial transfer petitions, courts must weigh the economic and social circumstances of both spouses, and that "generally, it is the wife's convenience which must be looked at" given prevailing socio-economic realities in India. It found the wife, being young, unemployed, and dependent on her aged parents who could not accompany her to Vellore, would face real hardship attending proceedings there. The Court also noted the well-established principle that related proceedings between the same parties on overlapping questions should be tried together to avoid conflicting decisions. It allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, transferred the husband's annulment case from the Family Court at Vellore to the Family Court at Chennai, and directed that all three related family-court cases between the couple be clubbed together for a common decision, with each side bearing its own costs.

Lesson Learnt

In matrimonial litigation, a spouse's convenience, particularly a wife's ability to safely and practically attend proceedings, is a central factor courts consider when deciding whether to transfer a case to a more convenient court, and related family-court cases between the same couple should ordinarily be heard together to avoid inconsistent outcomes.

N.C.V. Aishwarya vs A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware