Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
This judgment disposed of a batch of appeals filed by several formaldehyde-manufacturing units (resins used in adhesives etc.) located in Rajasthan and Haryana, all of which had been directed to stop operating by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) for lacking prior "Environmental Clearance" (EC) under the EIA 2006 notification. The NGT's key ruling came in a case called Dastak N.G.O., which the units challenged; a related batch of similarly-placed units (Pahwa Plastics) had already succeeded before the Supreme Court in 2022, where the Court held that units operating validly under a "Consent to Establish" and "Consent to Operate" from the State Pollution Control Board could not be shut down merely for a technical EC irregularity that the Pollution Control Board itself hadn't flagged. The present appellant-units argued their situation was identical to Pahwa Plastics.
The Supreme Court found that, like in Pahwa Plastics, the appellant-units here had been validly established and were operating under Consent to Establish and Consent to Operate granted by their respective State Pollution Control Boards, which themselves had only later realised formaldehyde units required prior EC and issued notices to the units to apply for it. Since the units had duly applied for EC within the given time, completed several steps of the process (screening, scoping, and in some cases public consultation), and two units had already been granted EC, the Court held this was not a case of bad faith non-compliance but of a bona fide procedural gap that the PCBs themselves had missed. Applying Pahwa Plastics' reasoning, the Court set aside the NGT's closure directions and allowed the units to continue operating pending a decision on their EC applications (to be made within one month), with electricity supply restored subject to dues, while preserving the regulators' right to act if the EC application is ultimately rejected for genuine contraventions.
An industrial unit that has been validly permitted to operate by the state Pollution Control Board should not automatically be shut down for a subsequently-discovered requirement (like prior Environmental Clearance) that the regulator itself had failed to flag at the outset: the appropriate remedy is to let the unit continue operating while the missing clearance is processed, not immediate closure, unless the unit itself acted in bad faith.
