Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Company & Insolvency LawSupreme Court of India

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority vs Anand Sonbhadra

Civil AppealDecided 17 May 2022
Civil Appeal No. 2222 of 2021
K.M. Joseph · Hrishikesh Roy

Background

NOIDA had leased a large plot of land to a real-estate developer for 90 years for a group-housing project, with the developer required to pay a premium in instalments (after an initial moratorium) plus annual lease rent. When insolvency proceedings (CIRP) were initiated against the developer, NOIDA first claimed as an "operational creditor" for dues under the lease, then later claimed instead to be treated as a "financial creditor": a status that gives much stronger rights in the insolvency process. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) held there was no financial lease and no financial debt, and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) affirmed this, prompting NOIDA's appeals to the Supreme Court.

Decision Breakdown

The Court analysed Section 5(8) of the IBC's definition of "financial debt," including the residuary catch-all clause in Section 5(8)(f) covering any transaction having the "commercial effect of a borrowing." It held that under the lease, NOIDA never advanced money or credit to the developer, the developer had to fund the premium and rent from its own resources or other lenders, so the arrangement did not amount to NOIDA raising or lending funds to the developer. Merely granting a payment moratorium followed by staggered instalments did not transform the lease into a financing arrangement or borrowing. The Court therefore held NOIDA was not a financial creditor. However, since both the NCLT and NCLAT had proceeded on the basis that NOIDA was at least an operational creditor, the Court did not disturb that classification and left it undecided as a legal question. As a result, all of NOIDA's appeals were dismissed, with parties bearing their own costs.

Lesson Learnt

A lessor who merely grants payment flexibility (moratorium, instalments) on lease premium and rent is not thereby converted into a "financial creditor" under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: that status requires the lessor to have actually advanced or raised funds for the lessee's benefit in a manner having the commercial effect of a borrowing, not merely deferred payment of what is owed.

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority vs Anand Sonbhadra – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware