Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Motor Accident Compensation LawSupreme Court of India

O.S. Kannan vs A. Alima and Anr.

Diary No.Decided 10 Feb 2022
Diary No. 25600 of 2021

Background

A Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Madurai had awarded compensation of Rs. 22,35,870/- to the claimant, which was upheld by the High Court. The matter reached the Supreme Court, which itself enhanced the compensation to Rs. 40 lakhs. Dissatisfied even with this enhanced amount, the claimant (petitioner here) filed a Review Petition seeking a further increase.

Decision Breakdown

The Court condoned the delay in filing the review petition but, after examining its contents, found no "error apparent on the face of the record" that would justify reopening its earlier decision. Since a review is not an opportunity to re-argue a case merely because a party wants more, and no manifest error was shown, the Court declined to interfere further with the compensation amount it had already fixed.

Lesson Learnt

A review petition is not a second appeal. Courts will only reconsider a final order if there is a glaring, apparent error, not simply because a party remains unsatisfied with the outcome, even in compensation matters.

O.S. Kannan vs A. Alima and Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware