Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

PACL vs. C.B.I.

Not available · 2023 INSC 795Decided 5 Sept 2023
Not available
A.S. Bopanna · M.M. Sundresh

Background

Two former directors of PACL (accused nos. 5 and 6): a company accused of running an illegal money-collection scheme in which more than Rs. 40,000 crore was allegedly siphoned off from investors nationwide: sought a blanket bail order that would apply not only to the CBI's case but also to numerous other complaints filed against them by different informants and investigating agencies across the country. They had already been in custody for over seven years and were on interim bail.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court declined to grant one omnibus bail order covering all the pending cases, holding that each case involved different facts, different investigating agencies, and materials the Court did not have before it: a single bail order could not mechanically be extended to unrelated proceedings. The applicants were directed to approach the respective jurisdictional courts for bail in each case, as a co-accused had successfully done. However, considering the applicants' prolonged incarceration and health difficulties, the Court extended their existing interim bail by three months to give them time to approach the appropriate courts.

Lesson Learnt

The Supreme Court will not grant a single "blanket" bail order to cover multiple separate criminal cases spread across different courts and agencies: an accused must seek bail separately in each case from the court that actually has jurisdiction over it.

PACL vs. C.B.I. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware