Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of India

Pani Ram (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. vs Union of India & Ors.

Civil AppealDecided 7 Mar 2022
Civil Appeal No. 2275/2019, with Interlocutory Application No. 22552 of 2022
L. Nageswara Rao · B.R. Gavai

Background

This is not a fresh judgment on a legal dispute but a short procedural order in an already-decided civil appeal. The original appellant, Pani Ram, had died during the pendency of proceedings, and his legal representatives applied to be substituted in his place so the matter's records reflected the correct parties. A connected application also sought to correct a clerical error in a judgment dated 17.12.2021: specifically, to replace the name of one advocate (Mr. Siddhartha Iyer) with another (Mr. Lalit Kumar) as recorded in paragraph 9 of that judgment.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court allowed the substitution application, directing that the case's title be amended to reflect the legal heirs of the deceased appellant in place of Pani Ram. It also allowed the correction application, permitting the advocate's name in paragraph 9 of the earlier judgment to be corrected. Both the miscellaneous application and the interlocutory application were disposed of as allowed, without any decision on the underlying merits of the original appeal (which had already been decided on 17.12.2021).

Lesson Learnt

Courts routinely handle housekeeping matters (such as substituting the heirs of a party who has died during litigation, or correcting a clerical error like a misprinted advocate's name) through simple applications, separate from and without reopening the substantive merits of a case that has already been decided.

Pani Ram (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. vs Union of India & Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware