Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawDelhi High Court

Parvesh Mann @ Sagar vs. State (NCT of Delhi)

Bail Application · 2026:DHC:7908Decided 16 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
BAIL APPLN. 3784/2026CNR: DLHC010428512026
Justice Girish Kathpalia

Background

The accused sought regular bail in a murder case (with charges also under the Arms Act). The application had been transferred to this particular bench on the accused's own request, on the stated basis that a related revision petition was pending there. When the matter came up, the prosecution revealed that the accused had actually filed three earlier bail applications, including one regular bail application, that had all been dismissed by a different judge, facts the defence had not disclosed when requesting the transfer.

Decision Breakdown

The defence claimed only "interim" bail applications had been dismissed by the other judge, but court records produced on the spot showed that one of the dismissed applications was in fact for regular bail. The Court held this was a clear case of "forum shopping", concealing an unfavourable history from one judge in order to get a fresh, more favourable hearing before another, and dismissed the bail application (along with the accompanying application) on that ground, deprecating such conduct.

Lesson Learnt

Deliberately concealing the outcome of earlier bail applications while seeking to have a matter heard by a different judge is treated by courts as impermissible forum shopping and can itself be a ground for outright dismissal, regardless of the merits.

Parvesh Mann @ Sagar vs. State (NCT of Delhi) – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware