Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Arbitration & Commercial LawDelhi High Court

Patiala Kashmir Roadways Pvt Ltd vs. Robbins Tunneling and Trenchless Technology India Pvt Ltd

Original Miscellaneous Petition (Miscellaneous, Commercial) · 2026:DHC:8230Decided 23 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 752/2026CNR: DLHC010455012026
Justice Om Prakash Shukla

Background

Patiala Kashmir Roadways sought extension of the mandate of a retired judge (Mr. Justice S. Muralidhar) who had been appointed as sole arbitrator in 2023 to decide disputes between the company and Robbins Tunneling and Trenchless Technology India, under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (which caps how long an arbitration can run without a court-granted extension).

Decision Breakdown

The respondent had no objection to extending the arbitrator's mandate. Considering the stage the arbitration had reached, the Court allowed the petition, extending the arbitrator's mandate for a further one year from 6 September 2026, and regularised the period that had elapsed since the earlier mandate technically expired.

Lesson Learnt

Arbitration proceedings in India operate under statutory time limits (Section 29A), and parties must proactively approach the court for an extension if the arbitration is not finished in time: otherwise the arbitrator's authority to decide the case can lapse.

Patiala Kashmir Roadways Pvt Ltd vs. Robbins Tunneling and Trenchless Technology India Pvt Ltd – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware