Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
The assessee, a paper manufacturing company, was originally assessed by an Assessing Officer in New Delhi, but its tax cases were later administratively transferred, under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, to Ghaziabad and then back to Chandigarh. When the tax department later tried to appeal against Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) rulings in this case, both the Punjab & Haryana High Court and the Delhi High Court refused to hear the appeals, each holding it lacked territorial jurisdiction, leaving the tax department unable to get any High Court to accept its appeals at all. The core legal question was which High Court has jurisdiction to hear a Section 260A appeal from an ITAT order when the case involves an administrative transfer of the assessee's file between tax officers in different states.
The Supreme Court held that a High Court's appellate jurisdiction under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act is a judicial remedy that stands on its own footing and cannot be altered by a purely executive/administrative transfer of a "case" between Assessing Officers under Section 127, allowing the executive to shift judicial jurisdiction this way would be an affront to judicial independence. The Court overruled the Delhi High Court's contrary view in CIT v. Sahara India Financial Corp. and CIT v. Aar Bee Industries, and reaffirmed the rule from Seth Banarsi Dass Gupta v. CIT that the correct forum for an appeal is always the High Court within whose territory the Assessing Officer who actually passed the original assessment order is located, not the location of the ITAT bench, and not wherever the case is later administratively transferred to. Applying this to the three connected appeals, the Court directed that one matter (assessed in Delhi) must go to the Delhi High Court, another (assessed in Ghaziabad) must go to the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court, and directed the Delhi High Court to entertain and decide the appeal it had wrongly refused.
Which High Court can hear a tax appeal depends on where the original Assessing Officer sat when the assessment was made: a later administrative transfer of the case file to a different tax office does not shift that jurisdiction, ensuring taxpayers and the department always have a clear, stable forum for appeal.
