Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Land belonging to the appellants in Village Gulabjhari, District Palamau (Jharkhand), was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 via a notification dated 01.10.1980, and the Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs.180 per decimal. The landowners sought a reference to the District Court, relying on several sale deeds from 1976-1979 to argue for a higher market value, but the Reference Court rejected those sale deeds and upheld the original award. On appeal, the Jharkhand High Court held that a sale deed dated 12.02.1979 (closer in time to the acquisition notification) should be used to determine market value instead of an earlier 1976 sale deed, but the High Court's order did not actually state what the resulting compensation figure was. The landowners appealed to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court found the High Court's judgment fundamentally incomplete: after selecting the 1979 sale deed as the relevant comparable, the High Court never discussed the land area, sale consideration, or location covered by that deed, nor did it apply the settled multi-factor approach for valuing acquired land (as laid down in Viluben Jhalejar Contractor v. State of Gujarat (2005) 4 SCC 789, which lists positive factors like proximity to road, regular shape, and nearness to developed areas, and negative factors like large area, interior location, or awkward frontage) beyond noting time-proximity alone. The Court also noted that with a nearly two-year gap between the sale deed and the acquisition notification, an appropriate price escalation (customarily around 12% per annum) should have been considered if the properties were otherwise comparable. Critically, the High Court's order never actually fixed a final market value or compensation figure, making the decree unclear and unexecutable. The Supreme Court therefore set aside the High Court's judgments and remitted both appeals for a fresh, complete determination of market value and compensation, with a request to decide within six months.
A court determining land acquisition compensation must not stop at picking a comparable sale deed based on time-proximity alone. It must analyze all the relevant factors (location, size, shape, sale consideration, likely price escalation) and arrive at a clear, final compensation figure, since a judgment leaving the actual relief undetermined cannot be meaningfully executed and only causes further litigation.
