Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Uncategorized (needs manual review)Supreme Court of India

Praveen Kumar C.P. vs Kerala Public Service Commission & Ors.

Not availableDecided 28 Jan 2022
Not available
L. Nageswara Rao · B.R. Gavai

Background

In an earlier civil appeal (C.A. No. 4846/2021) decided on 17.08.2021, the cause title of the judgment mistakenly repeated the respondent's name twice, reading "Kerala Public Service Commission Commission & Ors." A miscellaneous application was filed by court's own motion to have this clerical error corrected.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court allowed the application for correction of the cause title. It directed that the respondent's name in the earlier judgment be corrected to read simply "Kerala Public Service Commission & Ors." instead of the erroneous doubled version. All pending applications, if any, were disposed of.

Lesson Learnt

Courts retain the power to correct clerical or typographical errors in a judgment's cause title even after the judgment is pronounced, through a simple miscellaneous application: parties need not fear that a minor drafting slip in the case title affects the substance of a decision.

Praveen Kumar C.P. vs Kerala Public Service Commission & Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware