Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1094
An older qualification must still satisfy the eligibility rules governing the appointment sought. Here, the certificate's early date did not secure reinstatement, and rejection of eligibility should not be confused with a conclusive finding that the certificate was forged.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1095
A party benefiting from a conditional stay must meet its deposit requirement or face enforcement. The additional ₹15 crore deposit secures the pending dispute; it does not settle the land's final compensation or amount to an immediate payment to the landowners.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1093
An alleged attempt to kill does not become a lesser offence simply because the victim avoided a fatal injury. Restoring this charge means the accusation must be tried; it does not establish that the accused is guilty.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1090
For the assessment in this case, assistance reducing ordinary manufacturing costs was taxable even though the government wanted to encourage industry. The purpose and actual operation of the particular subsidy mattered more than its general development label.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1091
Proof that someone caused a serious injury does not by itself prove the additional ingredients of robbery. A court can substitute a lesser offence supported by the evidence; the sentencing reduction here depended on Appa's particular circumstances.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1092
Someone challenging an election must ensure that the personal-presentation requirement is met and can be proved. Merely entering the court building does not establish compliance, and a filing defect can end the challenge before the election allegations are examined.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1088
An employee who retires on 30 June may be entitled to the increment that falls due on 1 July after completing a year of service. Authorities that delay paying the amounts due must pay interest after the deadline set by the court.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1089
Recruitment must follow the qualifications stated in the advertisement and the governing Recruitment Rules. A court will not override a merit-based eligibility decision made under those rules merely because the candidate concerned was higher in the written test.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8797
A person who occupied property only because of employment has no independent right to remain once the employment and decree end. Even when a petition fails, courts can make practical arrangements to let a person recover personal belongings.
14543 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreA landlord had filed a civil suit for eviction of his tenant over non-payment of rent and termination of tenancy. The tenant did not appear, and the suit was decreed against him ex-parte; his later application to set aside that ex-parte decree was also dismissed for lack of sufficient reason. The High Court subsequently directed the tenant to deposit arrears of rent within two weeks as a condition for reviving his challenge, but when he deposited the amount late, the High Court refused to condone the delay and dismissed his applications, which he then challenged in the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and allowed the appeal, but on fresh conditions rather than unconditional relief. It directed the tenant to deposit an updated amount of future rent arrears (Rs. 2,77,000, after adjusting the earlier deposit) within eight weeks, on which the original eviction suit would stand restored and proceed to trial; it also allowed the landlord to withdraw the amount already deposited and required the tenant to keep paying ongoing rent. The Court made clear that if the tenant failed to deposit the arrears in time, the original ex-parte eviction decree would automatically revive.
Courts will sometimes give a defaulting party one more conditional chance to have their case heard on merits, but that chance comes with strict, self-executing conditions, missing a court-ordered deposit deadline can mean an adverse decree (like an eviction order) springs back into force without any further hearing.
