Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of India

P.S. Patel vs State Bank of Saurashtra

Review Petition (Civil)Decided 15 Mar 2022
Review Petition (Civil) No. 328 of 2022

Background

The petitioner's Special Civil Application No. 9396 of 1997 was dismissed by a single judge of the High Court, and that dismissal was upheld by the Division Bench. The petitioner's Special Leave Petition challenging the Division Bench's order was earlier dismissed by the Supreme Court, affirming the view taken by both courts below. The petitioner then filed this review petition, with a delay of 44 days, seeking reconsideration of that dismissal.

Decision Breakdown

The Court first condoned the 44-day delay in filing the review petition. On merits, it held that the grounds raised in the review petition did not disclose any "error apparent on the face of the record": the narrow standard required to reopen a final order in review jurisdiction. Finding no such error, the Court dismissed the review petition and let the earlier dismissal of the special leave petition stand.

Lesson Learnt

A review petition is not a second appeal. It succeeds only if there is a glaring, self-evident error on the face of the record, not merely because a party remains dissatisfied with a decision that has already been through original proceedings, an appeal, and a Supreme Court dismissal.

P.S. Patel vs State Bank of Saurashtra – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware