Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil Property & InheritanceSupreme Court of India

Rajesh Mitra @ Rajesh Kumar Mitra & Anr. vs Karnani Properties Ltd.

Not available · 2024 INSC 719Decided 20 Sept 2024
Not available
Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia · Justice Prasanna B. Varale

Background

This was an eviction dispute over a rented room on Park Street, Kolkata. The landlord sued for eviction, arguing that the tenant's mother (the original tenant) had died in 2009, and under West Bengal's 1997 tenancy law, a tenant's heirs can only continue occupying the premises for five years after the original tenant's death, so the appellants should have vacated by 2014. Both the Single Judge and the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court sided with the landlord, ordering the appellants to vacate within 60 days, based on an "admission" the tenant had allegedly made in an unrelated case.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court found that the eviction should never have been decided on the basis of an alleged "admission" without a full trial. On the merits, it held that the actual original tenant, Sh. S.K. Mitra, had died back in 1970, long before the 1997 Act came into force, and his tenancy was jointly inherited by his wife and the appellants at that time, under the older 1956 Act which allowed heritable tenancy without the five-year cutoff. The Court ruled that a new law cannot take away vested rights retrospectively unless the legislature says so in clear and unambiguous terms, which the 1997 Act did not do. It therefore held that the appellants' tenancy had not expired and set aside both the Single Judge's and Division Bench's eviction orders.

Lesson Learnt

A law that changes tenants' inheritance rights generally applies only from the date it comes into force. It cannot be used to retroactively strip away rights that had already vested under an earlier law, unless the new law says so explicitly and clearly.

Rajesh Mitra @ Rajesh Kumar Mitra & Anr. vs Karnani Properties Ltd. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware