Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
A landowner agreed in 1993 to sell agricultural land to Rajpal Singh, extending the sale-deed deadline twice at his own request. Before executing the sale, the landowner's wife filed a suit against her husband claiming the land under an alleged (and never produced) family settlement; the husband did not contest it, and a collusive decree was passed in her favour, but it was never registered or recorded in revenue records. The husband then went ahead and executed a registered sale deed in Rajpal Singh's favour in 1996, who took possession, cultivated the land, and got it mutated in his name. Five years later, in 2001/2007, the wife sued to cancel that sale deed and recover possession, relying on her earlier collusive decree; the Trial Court dismissed her suit but the High Court, in second appeal, reinstated it.
The Supreme Court held that the wife's suit for cancellation of the 1996 sale deed was barred by limitation, since such a suit must be filed within three years of acquiring knowledge of the sale deed, and here it was filed roughly five years after mutation and open possession by the purchaser: the additional prayer for possession being merely consequential does not extend the limitation period governing the substantive relief of cancellation. The Court also found the purchaser to be a bona fide buyer who paid full consideration without knowledge of the secret, unregistered, uncontested collusive decree obtained behind his back by husband and wife acting in concert. It held the High Court erred in second appeal by ignoring both the limitation bar and the collusive nature of the earlier decree, and restored the First Appellate Court's dismissal of the suit.
A secret, unregistered decree obtained through a collusive suit between family members cannot defeat the rights of a bona fide purchaser who later buys the same property for value without notice of it; and a suit to cancel a registered sale deed must be filed within three years of learning of that sale deed, regardless of an added prayer for possession.
