Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

Rakesh @ Bhura Rajak vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Diary No.Decided 30 Aug 2022
Diary No. 9265 of 2022
Uday Umesh Lalit · Ajay Rastogi

Background

The petitioner had been convicted by the Sessions Court, and the conviction upheld by the High Court, for an offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC (murder committed with common intention). His Special Leave Petition against the concurrent findings of guilt was earlier dismissed by the Supreme Court. He then filed this review petition, along with an application to condone delay in filing it, seeking reconsideration of that dismissal.

Decision Breakdown

The Court first allowed the application condoning the delay in filing the review petition. On the merits, however, it held that the grounds raised did not disclose any "error apparent on the face of the record": the narrow standard required to succeed in a review petition, as opposed to a fresh appeal on the merits. Finding no such error, the Court dismissed the review petition, leaving the earlier dismissal of the SLP (and hence the conviction) undisturbed.

Lesson Learnt

A review petition is not a second chance to re-argue a case on facts or law that the Court has already considered. It succeeds only where there is a glaring, self-evident error in the original order, a very high bar that ordinary disagreement with the outcome does not meet.

Rakesh @ Bhura Rajak vs The State of Madhya Pradesh – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware