Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil Property & InheritanceSupreme Court of India

Ramakant Ambalal Choksi vs Harish Ambalal Choksi & Ors.

Not available · 2024 INSC 913Decided 22 Nov 2024
Not available
Justice J.B. Pardiwala · Justice R. Mahadevan

Background

Three brothers and their wives (plaintiffs) jointly owned a property in Vadodara with their fourth brother and his family (defendants), having bought the ground and first floors together via two 1991 sale deeds. The plaintiffs sued to cancel a 2018 registered sale deed and sought a permanent injunction to stop the property from being transferred further, while the case was pending. The trial court granted a temporary injunction, but the Gujarat High Court reversed it and allowed the property to potentially change hands.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's injunction, holding that Order 39 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code independently empowers courts to restrain transfer of disputed property during litigation: separate from and in addition to the doctrine of "lis pendens" under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act (which only affects a buyer's rights, not the buyer's ability to purchase). The Court reasoned that even though a pendente lite (during-litigation) transfer would not defeat the eventual decree, allowing sales during litigation can still cause real hardship and embarrassment to the original claimants, and courts have long exercised discretion to freeze the property's status quo in such cases. The High Court's order was set aside, and the respondents were directed not to create any further encumbrances on the property.

Lesson Learnt

Simply relying on the "notice to buyers" protection of lis pendens is not always enough: a court can and should grant an injunction to freeze a disputed property outright while a title dispute is being litigated, especially in family property fights where multiple further transfers could complicate an eventual resolution.

Ramakant Ambalal Choksi vs Harish Ambalal Choksi & Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware