Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1073
In circumstantial-evidence cases, forensic and DNA evidence must actually corroborate the alleged crime: a conviction cannot survive where the most crucial scientific evidence, on its own terms, points away from rather than toward the prosecution's theory.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1074
A conviction based purely on circumstantial evidence requires every link in the chain, timeline, witness credibility, forensic matches, and motive, to be proven beyond reasonable doubt; gaps or suppressed evidence at any link entitle the accused to the benefit of the doubt, even in a serious case like a double murder.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8505
Courts will not quash a criminal case merely because the accused has a plausible alibi-type defence; unless that defence is conclusive and undisputed, the matter must be tested through the ordinary trial process.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8547
A private compromise between victim and accused cannot by itself secure quashing of a case involving serious, heinous allegations like attempted murder with a weapon: such matters must proceed to trial regardless of settlement.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8563
Railway Claims Tribunals cannot reject a bona fide passenger's death claim based on speculative inferences when there is no direct evidence of an alternative cause of death; the compensation scheme under the Railways Act is to be interpreted generously in favour of victims' families.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8559
In matrimonial offences, courts can and do quash criminal proceedings once a genuine compromise is verified directly with the complainant, sparing both parties a prolonged and pointless trial.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8541
A co-accused's bail does not automatically extend to another accused where their actual roles in the offence differ materially; delay caused by one's own defence counsel cannot later be used as a ground for bail.
Execution Petition · 2026:DHC:8567
An arbitral award must be adequately stamped before a court can enforce it; courts give only a limited window to cure such defects, after which the award becomes legally unusable until the deficiency is fixed.
Arbitration Petition · 2026:DHC:8555
A genuine settlement reached through mediation renders a pending arbitration-related court petition moot, allowing parties to close out litigation quickly once they resolve their dispute privately.
9257 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
In 1976, the appellants agreed to construct six godowns (warehouses) on their land which the Food Corporation of India (FCI) would then take on lease, with FCI helping arrange bank financing for construction. After construction, FCI inspected the godowns in 1978 and agreed to take possession of only four, citing defects in the remaining two; it took possession of those two only in 1979, after the defects were apparently addressed. The appellants sued for rent and damages covering the full period and all six godowns, arguing the 1976 agreement itself amounted to a lease and that FCI had earlier certified full completion. The trial court ruled in their favour, but the Madhya Pradesh High Court reversed this on appeal, reasoning the 1976 document was only an agreement to lease, not a lease itself.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's ruling and dismissed the appellants' case. Tracing legal precedent back to a 1919 Privy Council decision, the Court explained that a document is a "lease" only if it creates an immediate, present right of possession: an "agreement to lease," by contrast, only binds the parties to execute an actual lease later once certain conditions (like a completion certificate) are satisfied. Since the 1976 agreement expressly made the lease conditional on FCI's own officials certifying completion, and FCI's inspecting officer found two godowns still defective, no rent accrued on those two from the earlier date, and no lease had crystallised. The Court also rejected reliance on a later 1979 letter acknowledging possession, since the officials who issued it had themselves been departmentally punished for colluding with the appellants, and found no basis in the agreement for the enhanced/escalating rent the appellants also sought.
Not every agreement that promises a future lease is itself a lease: if a contract makes handover conditional on inspection or a completion certificate, rent and tenancy rights generally do not begin until those conditions are actually satisfied, regardless of what one party believes it has completed.
