Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Acting on secret information, police intercepted the appellant at a bus stand in Kullu on 23.08.1998 as he was about to board a Delhi-bound bus with a bag on his shoulder. On search of the bag (not of his person), they recovered charas weighing 1 kg 250 gms. He was charged and tried under Section 20 of the NDPS Act. The Trial Court acquitted him, holding that the mandatory safeguard under Section 50 of the NDPS Act (informing the suspect of his right to be searched before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer) had not been properly complied with. The State's appeal succeeded in the High Court, which convicted him, reasoning that Section 50 applies only to a search of a person, not a search of a bag.
The Supreme Court had to decide whether Section 50 of the NDPS Act, which mandates informing a suspect of the right to be searched in the presence of a Magistrate/Gazetted Officer, applies when only a bag carried by the accused is searched, and not his body. The Court held that Section 50 is triggered only by the search of a person, and a search of a bag or other article carried by that person does not attract this safeguard, following the Constitution Bench in State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh and the larger Bench decision in State of H.P. v. Pawan Kumar. It distinguished conflicting precedents (SK. Raju, Parmanand) which had extended Section 50 to bag searches, holding that those cases either involved a search of both the person and the bag, or did not follow the binding larger-Bench rulings. Since here only the bag was searched, Section 50 did not apply, and the High Court's conviction was upheld. Both appeals were dismissed.
The special procedural protection under Section 50 of the NDPS Act, the right to be searched before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer, applies strictly to searches of a person's body, not to searches of bags or luggage a person is carrying; citizens and investigators alike should understand this distinction affects what safeguards apply in a drug case.
