Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Family LawDelhi High Court

Ravina Dahiya vs. Aman Kumar

Transfer Petition (Civil) · 2026:DHC:7940Decided 16 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
TR.P.(C.) 194/2025CNR: DLHC010828362025
Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar

Background

The wife sought to transfer her husband's divorce petition from the Dwarka family court to the Rohini family court, citing that five other related proceedings between the parties (a domestic violence complaint, a maintenance petition, and three FIRs) were already pending in or triable by courts in Rohini, and that she lived nearby with her twin minor daughters. The husband opposed, alleging (without any supporting documents) that he faced a threat in Rohini and that the wife had fabricated her residence proof.

Decision Breakdown

The Court held that the power to transfer a case is discretionary and must weigh the parties' relative convenience, including proximity to the court, care of minor children, and whether related cases are already pending elsewhere. It found the wife's circumstances, caring for two young daughters, living near Rohini, and needing to litigate five connected cases there, outweighed the husband's unsubstantiated objections. The Court also rejected the argument that the husband should get to keep this one proceeding at his preferred forum simply because it was "the only one" where he had a choice.

Lesson Learnt

In matrimonial disputes, courts favour consolidating related litigation at one convenient forum, particularly to ease the burden on a parent caring for young children: vague, undocumented objections from the other side are unlikely to prevent such a transfer.

Ravina Dahiya vs. Aman Kumar – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware