Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
In 1975, the original plaintiffs (a mother and son, now represented by their legal heirs as respondents) executed two sale deeds in favour of the original defendant (now represented by the appellants, his legal heirs), who had agreed to help them pay off debts to banks and government departments. Of the Rs.7,000 price for each property, only Rs.2,500 was paid upfront, with the defendant retaining Rs.4,500 to clear the plaintiffs' outstanding dues: a promise he allegedly never fulfilled, prompting later agreements reaffirming the obligation. The plaintiffs sued in 1984 to cancel the sale deeds as void for non-payment of full consideration; the Trial Court and First Appellate Court dismissed the suit, but the High Court, in second appeal, reversed and decreed cancellation in the plaintiffs' favour.
The Supreme Court restored the Trial Court's dismissal of the suit, relying on Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and its own precedents (Vidhyadhar and Dahiben) holding that actual payment of the full sale price at the time of execution is not essential for a sale to be complete, once a sale deed for property worth more than Rs.100 is executed and registered, ownership passes even if the price is only part-paid. The Court held that non-payment of the balance sale consideration gives the seller only a right to sue for recovery of that money (with interest), not a right to have the sale deed declared void. Since the plaintiffs never filed such a recovery suit and instead sought cancellation years later, their claim to void the sale deeds failed, and the High Court had erred in reversing the concurrent findings of the courts below on this point of law.
A registered sale deed transfers ownership and remains legally valid even if the buyer has not paid the full price at the time of signing; if the balance amount is unpaid, the seller's remedy is to sue for that money, not to have the sale itself cancelled.
