Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

Ritu Rai vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

Criminal AppealDecided 29 Sept 2022
Criminal Appeal No. 1706 of 2022
Uday Umesh Lalit · J.B. Pardiwala

Background

The appellant was the complainant in a criminal case registered against respondent no. 2 for offences under Sections 328, 376, 504 and 506 IPC. During the trial, she applied to have a school official summoned to verify her Class-X mark sheet, in order to prove her age at the time of the offence, which had a bearing on which offence would apply. The trial court allowed this application and the mark sheet was placed on record after the witness was examined. The accused challenged this order before the Allahabad High Court, which set it aside.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that the trial court had rightly allowed the complainant's application to summon the school witness and place her mark sheet on record, since her age was relevant to determining the correct offence. It found no proper basis for the High Court to have set aside that order, especially since the document was already on record and the witness had already been duly examined. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and restored the trial court's original order permitting the evidence.

Lesson Learnt

Evidence relevant to a material fact in a criminal trial, such as proof of the victim's age through official school records, should ordinarily be allowed on record if procedurally proper, and higher courts should be cautious about undoing such evidentiary rulings once a witness has already been examined and the document placed on record.

Ritu Rai vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware