Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1073
In circumstantial-evidence cases, forensic and DNA evidence must actually corroborate the alleged crime: a conviction cannot survive where the most crucial scientific evidence, on its own terms, points away from rather than toward the prosecution's theory.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1074
A conviction based purely on circumstantial evidence requires every link in the chain, timeline, witness credibility, forensic matches, and motive, to be proven beyond reasonable doubt; gaps or suppressed evidence at any link entitle the accused to the benefit of the doubt, even in a serious case like a double murder.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8505
Courts will not quash a criminal case merely because the accused has a plausible alibi-type defence; unless that defence is conclusive and undisputed, the matter must be tested through the ordinary trial process.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8547
A private compromise between victim and accused cannot by itself secure quashing of a case involving serious, heinous allegations like attempted murder with a weapon: such matters must proceed to trial regardless of settlement.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8563
Railway Claims Tribunals cannot reject a bona fide passenger's death claim based on speculative inferences when there is no direct evidence of an alternative cause of death; the compensation scheme under the Railways Act is to be interpreted generously in favour of victims' families.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8559
In matrimonial offences, courts can and do quash criminal proceedings once a genuine compromise is verified directly with the complainant, sparing both parties a prolonged and pointless trial.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8541
A co-accused's bail does not automatically extend to another accused where their actual roles in the offence differ materially; delay caused by one's own defence counsel cannot later be used as a ground for bail.
Execution Petition · 2026:DHC:8567
An arbitral award must be adequately stamped before a court can enforce it; courts give only a limited window to cure such defects, after which the award becomes legally unusable until the deficiency is fixed.
Arbitration Petition · 2026:DHC:8555
A genuine settlement reached through mediation renders a pending arbitration-related court petition moot, allowing parties to close out litigation quickly once they resolve their dispute privately.
7878 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Rohan Dhungat and three other convicts serving life sentences in Goa had each been released on parole several times under the Goa Prisons Rules, 2006. They applied for premature release, and although the State Sentence Review Board recommended it, the trial court that convicted them advised against release given the gravity of their crimes, so the State refused. They went to the Bombay High Court at Goa arguing that, counting their parole periods, they had completed the 14 years of custody required for premature release. The High Court held that under Rule 335 of the 2006 Rules parole and furlough periods count as "remission of sentence" and so must be excluded when computing 14 years of actual imprisonment; without those periods the convicts fell short, and their petitions were dismissed.
The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions and upheld the High Court. It explained that parole is a conditional, temporary release granted by the State Government for a specific reason, and the Goa Rules themselves say the term of imprisonment does not include the period of parole, while Rule 335 treats parole as remission; it follows that parole time cannot simultaneously be counted as time actually served. The convicts' reliance on Sunil Fulchand Shah (a preventive-detention case under COFEPOSA) and Avtar Singh was found misplaced, and Section 55 of the Prisons Act, 1894, which deems a prisoner being escorted to or from prison to still be "in prison", has no application to release on parole. The Court added a practical concern: if parole counted as imprisonment, an influential prisoner could obtain parole repeatedly, since there is no cap on the number of times it can be granted, and thereby defeat the very purpose of requiring actual imprisonment.
For a life convict seeking premature release, only time actually spent behind bars counts towards the qualifying period: days out on parole do not, because parole is a concession outside prison, not imprisonment. Prison rules must be read so that their purpose (genuine time served) cannot be gamed.
