LegalAware
LegalAware.ai
EMPOWERING LEGAL AWARENESS

Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil Property & InheritanceSupreme Court of India

S. Shankaraiah Thr. GPA Holder & Ors. vs. The Land Acquisition Officer and Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapali, Karimnagar Dist. & Ors.

Civil Appeal · 2022 INSC 1185Decided 9 Nov 2022
Civil Appeal No. 6821 of 2022
M.R. Shah · Krishna Murari

Background

Land belonging to the appellants in Karimnagar district, Andhra Pradesh (now Telangana), was acquired in 1985 for excavation of coal by Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. The Land Acquisition Officer initially fixed compensation at Rs. 6,000-7,000 per acre; a Reference Court raised it substantially and separately awarded Rs. 15,000 per acre for sub-soil mineral rights. The Andhra Pradesh High Court fixed the market value at Rs. 1,23,000 per acre but deducted one-third for "development," awarding a net Rs. 80,000 per acre plus Rs. 10,000 per acre for coal deposits: an amount the landowners appealed as inadequate (the mining company's own appeal against the same order had already been dismissed by the Supreme Court).

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that a one-third deduction for development is meant to account for infrastructure like roads, sewage lines and parks that would ordinarily be carved out of acquired land, but here, since the land was acquired solely for coal excavation and the entire area was to be mined without any such development, no such deduction was justified, relying on its earlier ruling in Nelson Fernandes v. Special Land Acquisition Officer that the purpose of acquisition is a relevant factor in fixing compensation and development deductions. It left undisturbed the High Court's separate award of Rs. 10,000 per acre for coal deposits (already confirmed since the mining company's challenge had failed). The appeals were partly allowed: the claimants were held entitled to the full market value of Rs. 1,23,000 per acre (without the one-third deduction) plus the Rs. 10,000 per acre for coal deposits, with statutory benefits under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Lesson Learnt

A standard one-third deduction for "development costs" in land acquisition compensation is not automatic. It must be justified by the purpose of acquisition, and where land is acquired purely for extraction/mining with no infrastructure development contemplated, such a deduction is legally unwarranted.

Official source (sci.gov.in)View Judgment (PDF)
S. Shankaraiah Thr. GPA Holder & Ors. vs. The Land Acquisition Officer and Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapali, Karimnagar Dist. & Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware