Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Family LawSupreme Court of India

Safiya Bano alias Shakira & Ors. vs. The State of U.P. & Ors.

Not available · 2024 INSC 166Decided 30 Jan 2024
Not available
Justice B.R. Gavai · Justice Sanjay Karol

Background

The wife had filed an FIR against her husband and his relatives (the appellants) alleging offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 494 and 377 IPC. The husband's relatives sought to quash the FIR against themselves under Section 482 CrPC, but the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dismissed their petition, holding the complaint disclosed ingredients of an offence under Section 498-A. The relatives appealed to the Supreme Court, also placing on record a settlement agreement between the husband and wife that had since fallen through.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court examined the FIR and found the allegations against the husband's relatives were general, vague, and lacked any specific act of ill-treatment attributed to any individual appellant. It noted the appeal's claim, left unchallenged by the wife, that the FIR followed a restitution-of-conjugal-rights petition filed by the husband, suggesting it was aimed at pressuring the whole family. The Court quashed the FIR only as against the husband's relatives (the appellants), while making clear proceedings against the husband himself would continue.

Lesson Learnt

Courts will scrutinise dowry/cruelty complaints against a husband's extended family and quash them where the allegations are vague, generalised "omnibus" claims without specific acts attributed to each individual: merely being a relative of the husband is not enough to sustain a criminal case.

Safiya Bano alias Shakira & Ors. vs. The State of U.P. & Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware