Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil Property & InheritanceSupreme Court of India

Samarpan Varishtha Jan Parisar & Ors. vs Rajendra Prasad Agarwal & Ors.

Civil AppealDecided 6 May 2022
Civil Appeal No. 3520 of 2022
Hemant Gupta · V. Ramasubramanian

Background

The appellant runs "Samarpan," an old age home built by the Lucknow Municipal Corporation and leased to it, with rules allowing expulsion of any inmate who violates the home's regulations after one month's notice. The respondent-plaintiffs were admitted in 2016 but were later accused of misbehaving with staff and other inmates; after being given extra time to reform, their membership was cancelled in 2019 when no improvement was seen. The plaintiffs sued for an injunction against eviction, and while the trial court initially protected their possession, the Allahabad High Court ultimately restored an interim injunction in their favour, prompting the old age home's appeal to the Supreme Court.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that residents of the old age home occupy their rooms as licensees, not tenants or owners: a licence merely permits use of property without creating any legal interest in it, and a licensee's possession is only "permissive," not legal possession that can be protected by injunction once the licence is validly terminated. Reviewing a long line of precedent on the licensee/lessee/trespasser distinction, the Court held it would not sit in judicial review over the home's assessment that the plaintiffs' conduct was disruptive to fellow inmates, and that a licensee cannot use an injunction to force continued residence after termination for breach of rules. The Court set aside the High Court's injunction as legally unsustainable, but directed the appellant to arrange alternative accommodation (as already offered by the Social Welfare Department) for the plaintiffs and directed periodic welfare visits by legal services authorities and para-legal volunteers to the old age home.

Lesson Learnt

A person allowed to occupy someone else's property under a licence (as opposed to a lease or ownership) has no legal right to remain once the licence is properly terminated for breach of conditions, and courts will not grant an injunction to override that termination, even in sympathetic situations like elderly residents of a care home, though courts can direct alternative welfare arrangements alongside enforcing the legal position.

Samarpan Varishtha Jan Parisar & Ors. vs Rajendra Prasad Agarwal & Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware