Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1094
An older qualification must still satisfy the eligibility rules governing the appointment sought. Here, the certificate's early date did not secure reinstatement, and rejection of eligibility should not be confused with a conclusive finding that the certificate was forged.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1095
A party benefiting from a conditional stay must meet its deposit requirement or face enforcement. The additional ₹15 crore deposit secures the pending dispute; it does not settle the land's final compensation or amount to an immediate payment to the landowners.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1093
An alleged attempt to kill does not become a lesser offence simply because the victim avoided a fatal injury. Restoring this charge means the accusation must be tried; it does not establish that the accused is guilty.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1090
For the assessment in this case, assistance reducing ordinary manufacturing costs was taxable even though the government wanted to encourage industry. The purpose and actual operation of the particular subsidy mattered more than its general development label.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1091
Proof that someone caused a serious injury does not by itself prove the additional ingredients of robbery. A court can substitute a lesser offence supported by the evidence; the sentencing reduction here depended on Appa's particular circumstances.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1092
Someone challenging an election must ensure that the personal-presentation requirement is met and can be proved. Merely entering the court building does not establish compliance, and a filing defect can end the challenge before the election allegations are examined.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1088
An employee who retires on 30 June may be entitled to the increment that falls due on 1 July after completing a year of service. Authorities that delay paying the amounts due must pay interest after the deadline set by the court.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1089
Recruitment must follow the qualifications stated in the advertisement and the governing Recruitment Rules. A court will not override a merit-based eligibility decision made under those rules merely because the candidate concerned was higher in the written test.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8797
A person who occupied property only because of employment has no independent right to remain once the employment and decree end. Even when a petition fails, courts can make practical arrangements to let a person recover personal belongings.
14543 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreIn a 2007 firing incident arising from a land dispute, nine accused persons allegedly opened fire on the complainant's family, killing one victim (the appellant's father). Charges were framed against the accused in 2009 and the trial proceeded for over a decade, with witnesses examined and cross-examined, before the trial court discovered that the original charge sheet had inadvertently remained unsigned due to one accused's absence on the framing date. The trial court cured this in 2024 by re-framing the charge formally and allowed the case to continue from the same advanced stage, since two prosecution witnesses had since died and further delay risked more evidence being lost. The accused challenged this before the Allahabad High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C., and the High Court ordered that the entire trial be conducted afresh from the beginning.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's order for a fresh trial, restoring the trial court's order that allowed the case to continue from its existing advanced stage. The Court held that ordering a trial to start over ("de novo") is an exceptional remedy reserved for cases where the earlier proceedings were vitiated by serious illegality, lack of jurisdiction, or a genuine failure of justice, not a tool to be used for curable, technical defects, especially where the accused suffered no real prejudice. Relying on precedents including State of M.P. v. Bhooraji and Ajay Kumar Ghoshal v. State of Bihar, the Court found that the unsigned charge was, at worst, a curable irregularity under Sections 215 and 464 Cr.P.C., since the accused were undisputedly aware of and had fully participated in defending against the charges for over 14 years. The Court noted that ordering a fresh trial at this stage, after two crucial eyewitnesses had already died, would irreversibly prejudice the prosecution and defeat rather than serve justice, and criminal trials cannot be prolonged indefinitely over curable procedural defects.
A retrial from scratch is an extraordinary remedy that courts should order only where a genuine miscarriage of justice has occurred: a technical or curable procedural lapse, especially one causing no real prejudice to the accused's defence, is not sufficient grounds to wipe out years of trial proceedings and lost witness testimony.
