LegalAware
LegalAware.ai
EMPOWERING LEGAL AWARENESS

Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

Sanjay Raghunath Agarwal vs The Directorate of Enforcement

Criminal Appeal · 2023 INSC 408Decided 20 Apr 2023
Criminal Appeal No. 1198 of 2023
V. Ramasubramanian · Pankaj Mithal

Background

A company, Farmax India Limited, alleged that the appellant and others had helped it raise about USD 71 million through GDRs but diverted most of the funds through fraud and forged signatures. A police FIR over this was filed in 2013, but no final chargesheet was ever filed in it even nine years later. Based on a related SEBI order finding fraud in the GDR issue, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) separately registered a money-laundering case and arrested the appellant, a chartered accountant, in September 2022. He had been in jail for about seven months by the time of this appeal, seeking bail.

Decision Breakdown

The Court examined the specific role attributed to the appellant in the ED's own prosecution complaint and found it described him mainly as a coordinator/intermediary who used his professional expertise to facilitate the GDR transactions, while noting he had been in custody for a long period without the underlying (predicate) criminal case even reaching a chargesheet stage after nine years, and that the original complainant in that case had himself been denied further custody by a court when the ED tried to arrest him too. Weighing these facts, the Court found the case for the appellant's continued strict, indefinite incarceration under the tough PMLA bail conditions was not justified, and granted him bail, but to address the ED's concern that he might flee the country, it directed him to surrender his passport and to compulsorily attend every hearing of the ED's prosecution complaint.

Lesson Learnt

Bail under PMLA's strict twin conditions can still be granted where prolonged pre-trial detention (here, with the predicate offence uninvestigated for nine years) makes continued custody disproportionate, provided the court imposes safeguards, like passport surrender and mandatory court attendance, against flight risk.

Official source (sci.gov.in)View Judgment (PDF)
Sanjay Raghunath Agarwal vs The Directorate of Enforcement – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware