Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Arbitration & Commercial LawDelhi High Court

Sanjeev Shahi vs. Uflix International Private Limited

Arbitration Petition · CNR No. DLHC010327132026Decided 14 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
ARB.P. 1225/2026CNR: DLHC010327132026
Justice Om Prakash Shukla

Background

The petitioner sought appointment of a sole arbitrator relying on an arbitration clause (Clause 47) in a Lease Agreement dated 21.12.2022 with the respondent. The respondent's counsel did not dispute the existence of the arbitration agreement.

Decision Breakdown

Finding no dispute over the validity of the arbitration clause and no impediment to arbitration, the Court appointed Mr. Toshiv Goyal, Advocate, as sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes, under the DIAC's rules and fee schedule, leaving all questions of arbitrability and jurisdiction open for the arbitrator to decide.

Lesson Learnt

A clearly worded arbitration clause in a lease or commercial agreement makes it straightforward to get a court to appoint an arbitrator when a dispute arises: the court will not examine the underlying merits at this stage.

Sanjeev Shahi vs. Uflix International Private Limited – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware