LegalAware
LegalAware.ai
EMPOWERING LEGAL AWARENESS

Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawSupreme Court of India

Sanjiv Kumar Rajendrabhai Bhatt vs. State of Gujarat & Anr. (SLP (Crl.) No. 9445 of 2022)

SLP (Crl.) · 2023 INSC 515Decided 10 May 2023
SLP (Crl.) No. 9445 of 2022
M.R. Shah · C.T. Ravikumar

Background

The petitioner (a former IPS officer) circulated a letter asking one of the two judges hearing his special leave petition to recuse himself, on the ground that the same judge, while sitting on the Gujarat High Court in 2011, had made critical remarks about the petitioner's conduct and delaying tactics in an earlier matter arising from the same FIR. The State and the original complainant opposed the recusal request, calling it an attempt at "forum shopping" and "bench hunting."

Decision Breakdown

The Court noted that the petitioner had earlier approached the same judge (as part of a bench) in a related special leave petition arising out of the very same FIR without raising any objection, and that the present matter itself had been listed and adjourned multiple times over several months after the letter seeking recusal was written, without the letter being pressed. It was raised only when the case was actually about to be heard on merits. On these facts, the Court held the recusal request lacked bona fides and was made with a mala fide intent to avoid the bench, and rejected the prayer for recusal.

Lesson Learnt

A request for a judge to step aside from a case must be made promptly and in good faith; raising an old, previously-unused ground for recusal only at the point a matter is finally coming up for hearing on merits can itself be treated by the court as an improper attempt to handpick a more favourable bench, and can be rejected on that basis.

Official source (sci.gov.in)View Judgment (PDF)
Sanjiv Kumar Rajendrabhai Bhatt vs. State of Gujarat & Anr. (SLP (Crl.) No. 9445 of 2022) – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware