Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Family LawSupreme Court of India

Sapna Negi vs. Chaman Singh and Another

Not available · 2024 INSC 822Decided 24 Oct 2024
Not available
Justice B.R. Gavai · Justice Aravind Kumar · Justice K.V. Viswanathan

Background

The wife had filed a petition seeking to transfer her husband's divorce case (pending before the Family Court in Roorkee, Uttarakhand) to a Family Court in New Delhi. The husband had sought divorce alleging the wife was in a relationship with someone else and had neglected the marriage after taking up a teaching job; the wife said she had been forced to return to her parental home in 2019 because the husband neglected her and their daughter. The couple had not lived together since 2019, and a Supreme Court-referred mediation attempt in 2024 failed, with both sides ultimately admitting before the Court that the marriage had irretrievably broken down.

Decision Breakdown

Rather than simply deciding where the case should be tried, the Supreme Court used its special power under Article 142(1) of the Constitution to do "complete justice" directly, following its own precedent in Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan, it dissolved the marriage outright on the ground of irretrievable breakdown, since both parties agreed reconciliation was impossible and forcing them through further trial proceedings would only prolong the ordeal. To protect the couple's 8-year-old daughter (who lives with the mother), the Court directed the husband to pay a total of Rs 13,00,000 as permanent alimony for the child's welfare, on top of Rs 7,00,000 already placed in a fixed deposit in her name, and granted a formal decree of divorce.

Lesson Learnt

When a marriage has clearly and irretrievably broken down and both spouses agree there is no chance of reconciliation, the Supreme Court can bypass the normal, slower divorce process and grant a direct decree of divorce under Article 142, provided it also ensures the financial security of any children involved.

Sapna Negi vs. Chaman Singh and Another – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware