Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1094
An older qualification must still satisfy the eligibility rules governing the appointment sought. Here, the certificate's early date did not secure reinstatement, and rejection of eligibility should not be confused with a conclusive finding that the certificate was forged.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1095
A party benefiting from a conditional stay must meet its deposit requirement or face enforcement. The additional ₹15 crore deposit secures the pending dispute; it does not settle the land's final compensation or amount to an immediate payment to the landowners.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1093
An alleged attempt to kill does not become a lesser offence simply because the victim avoided a fatal injury. Restoring this charge means the accusation must be tried; it does not establish that the accused is guilty.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1090
For the assessment in this case, assistance reducing ordinary manufacturing costs was taxable even though the government wanted to encourage industry. The purpose and actual operation of the particular subsidy mattered more than its general development label.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1091
Proof that someone caused a serious injury does not by itself prove the additional ingredients of robbery. A court can substitute a lesser offence supported by the evidence; the sentencing reduction here depended on Appa's particular circumstances.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1092
Someone challenging an election must ensure that the personal-presentation requirement is met and can be proved. Merely entering the court building does not establish compliance, and a filing defect can end the challenge before the election allegations are examined.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1088
An employee who retires on 30 June may be entitled to the increment that falls due on 1 July after completing a year of service. Authorities that delay paying the amounts due must pay interest after the deadline set by the court.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1089
Recruitment must follow the qualifications stated in the advertisement and the governing Recruitment Rules. A court will not override a merit-based eligibility decision made under those rules merely because the candidate concerned was higher in the written test.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8797
A person who occupied property only because of employment has no independent right to remain once the employment and decree end. Even when a petition fails, courts can make practical arrangements to let a person recover personal belongings.
14543 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreA workmen's union (the appellant) challenged an interim order of the Bombay High Court that had stayed an earlier interim order of the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai. The Tribunal's interim order had granted workmen a Rs. 3,000 increase in wages pending final decision on a wage reference that had been pending before it since 2013. The High Court, in a writ petition filed by the employer (respondent), had stayed that interim wage increase.
The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court's interim stay order dated 06.05.2015. Instead, noting that the underlying wage reference had already been pending before the Industrial Tribunal since 2013, the Court directed the Tribunal to decide the reference itself expeditiously, preferably before the end of the year. The Court held that the Tribunal's earlier interim order of 26.02.2015 would continue to operate only until the reference is finally decided. Counsel on both sides recorded their undertaking to cooperate in the expeditious disposal. With this direction, the Court disposed of both the civil appeal and the connected writ petition before the High Court, leaving nothing pending in either.
Where interim relief in a long-pending labour dispute is contested, courts may decline to adjudicate the interim question on its merits and instead push for speedy final disposal of the underlying reference itself: interim skirmishes often give way to a direction for expeditious final resolution.
