Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of India

Savita Ambadas Kulkarni vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Review Petition (Civil)Decided 10 May 2022
Review Petition (Civil) No. 583 of 2022
Uday Umesh Lalit · S. Ravindra Bhat · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Background

The petitioner's original Special Leave Petition had earlier been rejected by the Supreme Court after hearing counsel for both sides. She then filed this Review Petition asking the Court to reconsider that rejection, and also sought an oral hearing on the review itself.

Decision Breakdown

The Court first rejected the request for an oral hearing on the review petition. It then held that the grounds raised in the review petition did not disclose any "error apparent on the face of the record", which is the narrow standard required to succeed in a review, and accordingly dismissed the review petition in a short order.

Lesson Learnt

A review petition is not a second chance to re-argue a case on its merits; the Supreme Court will only reconsider a decision if there is a clear, self-evident error on the face of the record, and it may decide such petitions without an oral hearing.

Savita Ambadas Kulkarni vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware