LegalAware
LegalAware.ai
EMPOWERING LEGAL AWARENESS

Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Motor Accident Compensation LawSupreme Court of India

Shaikh Sadik Shaikh Rafique v. Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd.

Civil Appeal · 2025 INSC 673Decided 13 May 2025
C.A. No.-006640-006640 - 2025
Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia · Justice K. Vinod Chandran

Background

The appellant, a 25-year-old man, was left completely bed-ridden and 100% disabled after the truck of his employer in which he was travelling collided with another vehicle. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded him Rs.16,00,000, and the High Court later enhanced this to Rs.25,83,600 after adjusting his income, disability level and future prospects. The appellant appealed to the Supreme Court seeking further enhancement of the compensation.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that, applying the incremental-income principle from the Constitution Bench ruling in National Insurance Co. v. Pranay Sethi, the appellant's claimed monthly income of Rs.9,000 could reasonably be accepted for an unskilled worker as of the 2015 accident date, and that a multiplier of 18 (for a 25-year-old) should apply instead of 17 as used by the High Court. Recalculating loss of future income, medical expenses, and a consolidated amount for pain, suffering and loss of amenities, the Court raised the total award to Rs.35,91,600, to be paid with 8% interest per annum within two months after adjusting amounts already paid.

Lesson Learnt

In motor accident compensation cases, courts must apply the settled formulas from Pranay Sethi (age-appropriate multiplier, future-prospects addition, and incremental income) consistently, and an appellate court can further enhance an award if these formulas were not correctly applied below.

Official source (sci.gov.in)View Judgment (PDF)
Shaikh Sadik Shaikh Rafique v. Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware