Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
A woman and the appellant were in a relationship from 2013, which continued even after she married someone else in 2014 and even after that marriage ended in a mutually agreed divorce in 2017. She alleged the appellant had repeatedly promised to marry her, kept having a sexual relationship with her on that basis, but ultimately got engaged to another woman in December 2017 without informing her. She filed a complaint alleging rape under Section 376 IPC on the theory that her consent was obtained through a false promise of marriage. The Allahabad High Court refused to quash the case, holding it involved disputed questions of fact unsuitable for quashing under Section 482 CrPC.
The Supreme Court reiterated the settled legal test: consent is vitiated by a "misconception of fact" only where a promise to marry was false from the very outset (made in bad faith with no real intention of honouring it, and directly linked to the woman's decision to engage in the sexual relationship) as distinct from a promise made honestly that simply was not kept later. Examining the complaint and chargesheet as they stood, the Court found the relationship had been genuinely consensual between two educated adults over several years, continuing through her marriage to someone else and after her divorce, which was inconsistent with the claim that her consent throughout had been procured by a false promise made in 2013. Since even taking the prosecution's allegations at face value, the essential ingredients of rape under Section 375/376 IPC were not made out, the High Court was wrong to say this was merely a disputed factual question unfit for quashing. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment, allowed the Section 482 CrPC application, and quashed the FIR, chargesheet, and cognizance order.
Not every failed promise to marry that was followed by a sexual relationship amounts to rape in law: criminal liability requires proof that the promise was false and insincere from the start and was the actual reason the person agreed to the relationship; courts can and should quash such prosecutions at the threshold when the alleged facts, even if fully true, do not add up to that offence.
