Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1094
An older qualification must still satisfy the eligibility rules governing the appointment sought. Here, the certificate's early date did not secure reinstatement, and rejection of eligibility should not be confused with a conclusive finding that the certificate was forged.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1095
A party benefiting from a conditional stay must meet its deposit requirement or face enforcement. The additional ₹15 crore deposit secures the pending dispute; it does not settle the land's final compensation or amount to an immediate payment to the landowners.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1093
An alleged attempt to kill does not become a lesser offence simply because the victim avoided a fatal injury. Restoring this charge means the accusation must be tried; it does not establish that the accused is guilty.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1090
For the assessment in this case, assistance reducing ordinary manufacturing costs was taxable even though the government wanted to encourage industry. The purpose and actual operation of the particular subsidy mattered more than its general development label.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1091
Proof that someone caused a serious injury does not by itself prove the additional ingredients of robbery. A court can substitute a lesser offence supported by the evidence; the sentencing reduction here depended on Appa's particular circumstances.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1092
Someone challenging an election must ensure that the personal-presentation requirement is met and can be proved. Merely entering the court building does not establish compliance, and a filing defect can end the challenge before the election allegations are examined.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1088
An employee who retires on 30 June may be entitled to the increment that falls due on 1 July after completing a year of service. Authorities that delay paying the amounts due must pay interest after the deadline set by the court.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1089
Recruitment must follow the qualifications stated in the advertisement and the governing Recruitment Rules. A court will not override a merit-based eligibility decision made under those rules merely because the candidate concerned was higher in the written test.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8797
A person who occupied property only because of employment has no independent right to remain once the employment and decree end. Even when a petition fails, courts can make practical arrangements to let a person recover personal belongings.
14543 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreThe appellant, Sharla Bazliel, alleged that after her mother's death, her elderly and ailing father was isolated from the family and manipulated by the respondents, who allegedly forged his signatures on documents to grab his ancestral property and misappropriated her parents' bank deposits by fraudulently posing as nominees. She lodged an FIR alleging cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy, but the Himachal Pradesh High Court quashed the FIR at a preliminary stage, relying on a Supreme Court precedent that required proof that the accused had actually created a false document. Both the complainant and the State of Himachal Pradesh appealed against this quashing to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court held that the High Court had acted prematurely in quashing the FIR, because at the time of quashing, the disputed documents had already been sent for forensic handwriting examination and the investigation was still ongoing: findings on forgery could not be recorded before that report arrived. It noted that a subsequent forensic (SFSL) report had, in fact, confirmed that the signatures on the property documents were facsimile stamps rather than the father's genuine handwritten signatures, supporting the forgery allegations. The Court held the precedent relied on by the High Court was misapplied at this premature stage, and that the FIR's allegations, along with the material already collected, were sufficient to let the investigation and prosecution proceed rather than being stifled at the threshold. It set aside the High Court's order quashing the FIR and directed the investigating officer to complete the investigation, clarifying that its observations were limited to deciding this appeal and would not affect the parties' rights and defences at later stages.
High Courts should be cautious about using their inherent power to quash an FIR while a genuine investigative question (like a forensic handwriting comparison) is still pending, quashing a case prematurely, before the evidence is even gathered, can shut down a legitimate prosecution before it has a fair chance to be tested.
