Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Family LawSupreme Court of India

Sharmila Bagchi @ Gangopadhayay vs. Sourav Gangopadhayay

Transfer Petition (Civil)Decided 18 Jan 2022
Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 124 of 2020
Surya Kant

Background

The petitioner-wife sought transfer of a divorce petition filed by her husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, which was pending before the Family Court in Burdwan, West Bengal, to a Family Court in Shamli, Uttar Pradesh, where she was residing with her parents and had also filed a maintenance petition. The couple, both doctors by profession, married in January 2017 and had no children. The husband, despite being served notice, did not appear or contest the transfer petition.

Decision Breakdown

The Court noted that the respondent-husband had been duly served (as confirmed by a signed acknowledgment card) but showed no interest in contesting the transfer. Taking into account that the wife was residing with her parents in Shamli and had also filed a maintenance case there, the Court found it appropriate to allow the transfer petition. It ordered the divorce suit to be moved from the Family Court in Burdwan to the Family Court in Shamli, with the records to be transferred immediately, while giving the husband liberty to seek recall of the order within three months if it turned out he had not actually been served.

Lesson Learnt

In matrimonial transfer petitions, courts routinely give weight to the convenience and current residence of the wife, especially where the husband does not contest; such transfers are often granted to ease the burden of litigating from a distant or inconvenient forum.

Sharmila Bagchi @ Gangopadhayay vs. Sourav Gangopadhayay – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware