Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Shiv Developers, an unregistered partnership firm holding a 60% share in a plot of land in Vadodara, alleged that its partners were defrauded when two of their co-venturers in a related firm, "Aksharay Developers," secretly formed a new firm of the same name (excluding the original partner) and then used it to execute a sale deed transferring away Shiv Developers' share in the land, without ever paying the promised consideration. Shiv Developers sued for a declaration that the sale deed was null and void and for an injunction. The defendants sought to have the plaint thrown out at the threshold, arguing that Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 bars an unregistered firm from suing on a contract. The trial court rejected this application, but the Gujarat High Court reversed it in the defendants' favour, effectively killing the suit before trial.
The Supreme Court held that Section 69(2) only bars a suit brought to enforce a right arising out of a contract that the unregistered firm itself entered into with the third party in the course of its business. It does not bar every suit merely because the plaintiff happens to be an unregistered firm. Relying on its own precedents (Raptakos Brett, Haldiram Bhujiawala, and Purushottam), the Court found that the sale transaction here was not part of Shiv Developers' ordinary construction business, and that the suit was really about enforcing common-law and statutory rights (the sale deed's own condition voiding it upon dishonoured cheques, and remedies for fraud and misrepresentation) rather than enforcing a business contract. The High Court, the Court found, had focused only on a headnote of a precedent while missing its actual reasoning, and had wrongly extended Section 69(2) to a transaction outside the firm's business. The appeal was allowed, the High Court's order set aside, and the trial court's original order (permitting the suit to proceed) was restored.
Being an unregistered partnership firm does not automatically bar it from suing in court: the bar under Section 69(2) of the Partnership Act applies only to suits enforcing rights arising from a contract made in the ordinary course of the firm's business with the opposing party, not to suits based on fraud, statutory rights, or transactions outside the firm's regular business.
