Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1073
In circumstantial-evidence cases, forensic and DNA evidence must actually corroborate the alleged crime: a conviction cannot survive where the most crucial scientific evidence, on its own terms, points away from rather than toward the prosecution's theory.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1074
A conviction based purely on circumstantial evidence requires every link in the chain, timeline, witness credibility, forensic matches, and motive, to be proven beyond reasonable doubt; gaps or suppressed evidence at any link entitle the accused to the benefit of the doubt, even in a serious case like a double murder.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8505
Courts will not quash a criminal case merely because the accused has a plausible alibi-type defence; unless that defence is conclusive and undisputed, the matter must be tested through the ordinary trial process.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8547
A private compromise between victim and accused cannot by itself secure quashing of a case involving serious, heinous allegations like attempted murder with a weapon: such matters must proceed to trial regardless of settlement.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8563
Railway Claims Tribunals cannot reject a bona fide passenger's death claim based on speculative inferences when there is no direct evidence of an alternative cause of death; the compensation scheme under the Railways Act is to be interpreted generously in favour of victims' families.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8559
In matrimonial offences, courts can and do quash criminal proceedings once a genuine compromise is verified directly with the complainant, sparing both parties a prolonged and pointless trial.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8541
A co-accused's bail does not automatically extend to another accused where their actual roles in the offence differ materially; delay caused by one's own defence counsel cannot later be used as a ground for bail.
Execution Petition · 2026:DHC:8567
An arbitral award must be adequately stamped before a court can enforce it; courts give only a limited window to cure such defects, after which the award becomes legally unusable until the deficiency is fixed.
Arbitration Petition · 2026:DHC:8555
A genuine settlement reached through mediation renders a pending arbitration-related court petition moot, allowing parties to close out litigation quickly once they resolve their dispute privately.
7878 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
The appellant, a transport contracting firm, collected payments from a cement company for transporting goods and paid out part of those amounts to individual truck owners/operators hired for each consignment, without deducting tax at source (TDS) on these payments as required under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 57,11,625 of these payments as a deduction from the firm's taxable income under Section 40(a)(ia) for failure to deduct TDS, and this was upheld by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and the Rajasthan High Court. The firm appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing it had no sub-contracts with the truck owners and so was not obliged to deduct TDS, and separately argued that later, more lenient amendments to the law should apply retrospectively to save it from disallowance.
The Supreme Court held that the relationship between the transport firm and the individual truck owners engaged for each consignment amounted to a contract/sub-contract under Section 194C, triggering the obligation to deduct TDS once payment for a single transaction crossed the threshold. The Court rejected the firm's argument that disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) applied only to amounts still outstanding at year-end, holding it also covers amounts already paid out during the year. It further held that a 2014 amendment relaxing the disallowance rule was not retrospective and could not rescue the appellant, distinguishing it from an earlier 2010 amendment the Court had separately treated as curative and retrospective. Finding no genuine hardship to the appellant since only the unauthorised-deduction portion of its income was disallowed, the Court dismissed the appeal with costs.
Anyone running a business that hires sub-contractors or pays out large sums to third parties (such as truck owners or labour contractors) must deduct tax at source once payments for a single job cross the statutory threshold, failing to do so can mean losing the tax deduction on that entire expense, not just facing a penalty.
