Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Service & Administrative LawSupreme Court of India

Shri Ram Shridhar Chimurkar vs Union of India & Anr.

Civil AppealDecided 17 Jan 2023
Civil Appeal No. 386 of 2023
K.M. Joseph · B.V. Nagarathna · V. Ramasubramanian

Background

Shridhar Chimurkar, a Superintendent in the National Sample Survey Organisation at Nagpur, retired in 1993 and died childless in 1994. In April 1996 his widow, Maya Motghare, adopted Shri Ram (the appellant), and in 1998 she remarried and moved to Delhi. In 2000 the appellant claimed family pension as the deceased employee's adopted son; the government refused. The Central Administrative Tribunal ruled in his favour in 2002, reasoning that under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 a widow's adoption is deemed to be an adoption by her late husband too, but the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) reversed this in 2015.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the High Court. It accepted that under Hindu law a child adopted by a widow does become, in law, the child of her deceased husband (Sawan Ram, Sitabai). But those rights operate only within the adoptive family; they do not automatically translate into a claim on the public exchequer under pension rules, which must be read on their own terms. The phrase "family in relation to a government servant" in Rule 54(14)(b) requires a direct, not remote, connection: the listed relatives (spouse, children, dependent parents, disabled siblings) are people who had a familial relationship with, and were dependent on, the employee during his lifetime. Family pension exists to support those left destitute by the employee's death (Poonamal), so "adopted legally" must mean adopted by the employee during his or her lifetime, not by the surviving spouse afterwards, otherwise the provision could be abused. A posthumous biological child is different, because the employee did have a relationship with that child.

Lesson Learnt

A child adopted by a government servant's widow after his death may be his son or daughter under Hindu law, but is not entitled to family pension: pension rules protect only those who were part of the employee's family during his lifetime.

Shri Ram Shridhar Chimurkar vs Union of India & Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware