Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1094
An older qualification must still satisfy the eligibility rules governing the appointment sought. Here, the certificate's early date did not secure reinstatement, and rejection of eligibility should not be confused with a conclusive finding that the certificate was forged.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1095
A party benefiting from a conditional stay must meet its deposit requirement or face enforcement. The additional ₹15 crore deposit secures the pending dispute; it does not settle the land's final compensation or amount to an immediate payment to the landowners.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1093
An alleged attempt to kill does not become a lesser offence simply because the victim avoided a fatal injury. Restoring this charge means the accusation must be tried; it does not establish that the accused is guilty.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1090
For the assessment in this case, assistance reducing ordinary manufacturing costs was taxable even though the government wanted to encourage industry. The purpose and actual operation of the particular subsidy mattered more than its general development label.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1091
Proof that someone caused a serious injury does not by itself prove the additional ingredients of robbery. A court can substitute a lesser offence supported by the evidence; the sentencing reduction here depended on Appa's particular circumstances.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1092
Someone challenging an election must ensure that the personal-presentation requirement is met and can be proved. Merely entering the court building does not establish compliance, and a filing defect can end the challenge before the election allegations are examined.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1088
An employee who retires on 30 June may be entitled to the increment that falls due on 1 July after completing a year of service. Authorities that delay paying the amounts due must pay interest after the deadline set by the court.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1089
Recruitment must follow the qualifications stated in the advertisement and the governing Recruitment Rules. A court will not override a merit-based eligibility decision made under those rules merely because the candidate concerned was higher in the written test.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8797
A person who occupied property only because of employment has no independent right to remain once the employment and decree end. Even when a petition fails, courts can make practical arrangements to let a person recover personal belongings.
14543 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreThe original plaintiff sued to cancel a sale deed dated 08.03.2006 that he had executed in favour of the appellant, arguing that he was defrauded and unduly influenced into it and that the claimed consideration of Rs 1 lakh was never actually paid. He had also made a Will dated 15.10.2013 disinheriting her, and had lodged police and DCP complaints in 2013 alleging fraud. The Civil Judge cancelled the sale deed and ordered possession on 09.04.2018, and the First Appellate Court upheld that decision.
The High Court dismissed the second appeal. It held that the finding of fraud and undue influence is a finding of fact that was upheld by both the trial and first appellate courts, so it did not warrant interference. The appellant could not prove how she had generated Rs 1 lakh in cash, given her bank passbooks and her own evidence on income. The Court also noted that once both sides had led evidence, the question of who bore the burden of proof lost significance, and that the deed's genuineness had to be assessed on the whole record.
A buyer who claims a sale price was paid in cash must be able to prove it, since an unexplained payment can cast doubt on a sale. Higher courts rarely overturn factual findings that two lower courts have agreed on.
