Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Uncategorized (needs manual review)Supreme Court of India

Sri Pal Singh vs. The General Manager, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Diary No.Decided 25 Aug 2022
Diary No. 22591 of 2021
Uday Umesh Lalit · Ajay Rastogi

Background

Sri Pal Singh had earlier filed a Special Leave Petition (No. 6380 of 2019) against ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company, which was disposed of by the Supreme Court. He then sought to have that decision reviewed by filing a review petition, but he filed it 888 days late.

Decision Breakdown

The Court examined the application seeking condonation (excuse) of this very long delay and found the explanation offered for the delay "not satisfactory at all." Because the delay was not adequately explained, the Court refused to condone it, and as a direct consequence dismissed the review petition itself without going into its merits.

Lesson Learnt

Courts expect litigants to act promptly; an unexplained or poorly explained delay of this magnitude (here, nearly two and a half years) can be fatal to a review petition regardless of what its underlying merits might have been.

Sri Pal Singh vs. The General Manager, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware