Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
The appellant (a power company) had awarded an EPC contract worth around Rs. 827 crore to the respondent for building a gas-based power station, but payments fell into dispute and the respondent (the contractor/operational creditor) filed an application under Section 9 of the IBC seeking to initiate insolvency proceedings against the appellant for non-payment of dues. The National Company Law Tribunal admitted the application and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal affirmed it. The appellant challenged this before the Supreme Court, arguing among other things that the claim was time-barred, that the amounts claimed were not genuine "operational debt," that a pre-existing dispute existed, and that the EPC contract itself had been frustrated by the passage of time.
The Supreme Court held that the EPC contract had not been frustrated merely by suspension of work, since neither party had actually terminated it and the delay was self-induced by the parties' own conduct rather than any unforeseen impossibility. It found that payments due under the EPC contract's payment schedule qualified as "operational debt," but amounts claimed for suspension, idling, or demobilisation charges were merely unassessed damages and did not qualify. The Court also held there was no genuine pre-existing dispute, since the appellant had stayed silent for years in response to the respondent's legal notices. Crucially, however, the Court found the claim was time-barred: the debt crystallized in early 2012 when liability was acknowledged, the respondent took no action within three years, and its later legal notices (sent after four years, with no reply from the appellant) could not revive the limitation period under Section 18 of the Limitation Act. The Court therefore allowed the appeal, set aside the insolvency admission, but gave the respondent liberty to pursue its claims through arbitration as provided in the EPC contract.
Insolvency proceedings under the IBC are not a substitute for pursuing a time-barred civil or arbitral claim: a creditor must act within the limitation period from when a debt crystallizes, and sending legal notices years later (met only with silence) does not reset the clock or revive a stale claim.
