Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
In January 1995, Central Excise officers including R.K. Srivastava and A.K. Gaba seized business records during an inspection of a factory in Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, and allegedly demanded Rs. 80,000 as illegal gratification to return the documents. A CBI trap led to the recovery of the cash and the accused being caught with "phenolphthalein-stained hands," after which a charge-sheet was filed under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC. The Special Judge, Lucknow convicted the accused (including the respondents A.K. Gaba, Alok Gupta and others) in 2014, but the Allahabad High Court's Lucknow Bench acquitted all of them in 2019, finding the prosecution's evidence unreliable. The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed to the Supreme Court against the acquittal.
The Supreme Court noted that the prosecution had failed to produce a tape-recorded conversation that could have conclusively established who was present and what was actually said during the alleged demand for a bribe, and that an adverse inference could be drawn against the prosecution for withholding such material evidence. It reiterated the settled principles governing appeals against acquittal: that an acquittal carries a double presumption of innocence, and an appellate court should not disturb it if the High Court's view is a reasonable, possible one on the evidence, even if another view was also possible. Applying this standard, the Court found the High Court had meticulously re-appreciated the evidence and given cogent reasons for extending the benefit of doubt, and that the prosecution had failed to prove the essential ingredients of demand, acceptance, and criminal conspiracy beyond reasonable doubt. It therefore held the High Court's acquittal was neither perverse nor contrary to law, and dismissed the State's appeals.
An order of acquittal carries a strong presumption of innocence that appellate courts are reluctant to disturb unless the acquittal is perverse or manifestly unreasonable; prosecutors who withhold or fail to produce key evidence (such as a recorded conversation) in a corruption case risk having that evidence held against them, undermining the case.
