Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
The appellants' predecessor had leased a plot in Kaithal to Burmah Shell in 1958 for 20 years, renewable once, and the lease (after one renewal) expired in 1998. Before that, the Central Government's Burmah Shell (Acquisition of Undertakings) Act, 1976 had transferred Burmah Shell's leasehold rights first to the Central Government and then, by notification, to Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL). After the lease period ended, the appellants issued a notice terminating the tenancy and sued in civil court for possession, arguing BPCL had become a trespasser and that the special 1976 Act overrode the Haryana rent control law; BPCL argued it had become a statutory tenant under the Haryana (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 and could be evicted only through the Rent Controller, not a civil suit. The trial court sided with the appellants, but the first appellate court and the High Court held the civil court had no jurisdiction.
The Supreme Court held that under Sections 5(2) and 7(3) of the 1976 Act, BPCL had statutorily stepped into Burmah Shell's shoes as tenant, and that upon expiry of the contractual lease term, it became a statutory tenant under the local rent legislation: a status the Court traced through the Constitution Bench ruling in V. Dhanapal Chettiar v. Yesodai Ammal, which held that even after a lease is validly determined, a tenant continues to enjoy statutory protection until evicted under the applicable Rent Act, and no fresh notice to quit is needed. Since the Haryana Act, 1973 is a complete code governing landlord-tenant disputes for rented urban land, it impliedly ousts the civil court's jurisdiction over such possession claims. The Court distinguished the precedents cited by the appellants as dealing with different questions (entitlement to a second renewal, not the effect of statutory tenancy after expiry) and upheld the High Court's view that the appellants' only remedy was eviction proceedings before the Rent Controller. The appeal was dismissed.
Where a special rent control statute comprehensively governs the landlord-tenant relationship for a property, a landlord cannot bypass it by filing an ordinary civil suit for possession once the contractual lease expires: the tenant's continued occupation is protected as a "statutory tenancy," and eviction must be sought through the rent authority created by that statute.
