Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Journalist-employees of newspaper groups including Dainik Bhaskar and All India Reporter had wage disputes referred to Labour Courts in Maharashtra, but the references were made not by the State Government directly, as required by Section 17(2) of the Working Journalists Act, but by Additional/Deputy Commissioners of Labour to whom the State Government (GoM) had purported to delegate that power via a 2016 notification. Two Bombay High Court benches (Aurangabad and Nagpur) held that Section 17(2) does not permit such delegation and set aside the resulting Labour Court awards and references, prompting appeals by the affected employees and unions to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court agreed with the High Court that Section 17(2) vests the power to refer a dispute to the Labour Court exclusively in the State Government itself, distinguishing it from Section 17(1), which does allow delegation for the separate, narrower function of issuing a recovery certificate in undisputed cases. Because the statute requires the State Government's own satisfaction that a genuine dispute exists before a reference is made, that decision-making function could not be sub-delegated to the specified authorities, and the Court rejected arguments that the Working Journalists Act's beneficial character or comparisons to the Industrial Disputes Act justified reading in an implied power of delegation. However, rather than simply dismissing the appeals and leaving employees without remedy (especially since the Act has since been repealed and replaced by the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020) the Court used its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to craft a transitional remedy: the State Government must independently revisit every affected reference, record fresh satisfaction on whether a genuine dispute existed, and either make a fresh valid reference (with proceedings continuing from where they left off) or notify the employee that no dispute existed, in which case the employee could pursue other recovery remedies.
A statutory power to make an administrative reference of a dispute to a court or tribunal cannot be delegated unless the law expressly says so, even where a related but distinct power in the same section can be delegated, and where strict enforcement of that rule would strand years of pending litigation on a technicality, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to fashion a practical, fair transition rather than leaving affected workers with nothing.
